Your first visibility picture
A concise reading of where your brand appeared, where it was absent, and the coverage behind the result.
See how AI describes your business, who else gets named, and what to investigate next. A report you can read, question and share.
No card for the report · 3 engines · results in about a minute
Professional networking & recruiting
Partial scan: 5 of 15 planned questions returned answers across all three engines. These results describe this dated example, not your brand.
Actual coverage is shown in your report. Unanswered requests are marked n/a and excluded from result calculations.
4 linked answers
11 without a link
15 Sep 2026 · Partial scan. Results describe this example, not your brand.
Your report brings captured answers, brand mentions and source links together. Look inside the real example, then explore your own brand.
Open the sample PDF ↗The finding, the evidence and a focused place to start.
A concise reading of where your brand appeared, where it was absent, and the coverage behind the result.
Compare brands by how often they appear in the received answers, with counts and a clear denominator.
Distinguish a name in the answer, a source link and a recommendation with a link. Missing responses remain visible as n/a.
Read the tone breakdown, its sample size and confidence, alongside phrases taken from the responses.
Inspect captured answer excerpts. See the wording behind a finding instead of relying on a score alone.
Review suggested actions and the evidence offered for each. Treat them as ideas to investigate, not guaranteed outcomes.
Three questions from the LinkedIn report, scanned on 15 September 2026.
| Question | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini |
|---|---|---|---|
| What professional networking platforms help build industry connections? | Named | Named | Recommended + link |
| Which sites let me connect with career mentors and peers globally? | Recommended + link | Named | Named |
| Is LinkedIn Recruiter worth it for finding top talent? | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Named = a text mention without a link. Recommended + link = both are present. n/a = no response received.
The LinkedIn example contains 15 received answers from five questions. Ten additional planned questions have no responses. Its findings apply to the received sample.
This report does not measure change over time, explain causes, or count traffic and referrals to your website.
Perplexity, Copilot, Grok and Google AI Overviews are outside the free scan. Ongoing monitoring is a separate step.
See what continuous monitoring adds ↗Yes. Explore the LinkedIn example on this page or open the original PDF without entering an email. These are dated sample results, not a forecast for your business.
Open the original PDF ↗No. It lists 15 planned questions across three engines but contains 15 received answers, covering five questions. Missing responses are marked n/a. The website summary separates brand mentions from links using the report’s citation-depth breakdown.
No. It is a one-time snapshot with no credit card required. Recurring monitoring is available separately.
A mention names the brand. A website citation links to its domain. In this example all 15 received answers name LinkedIn, while four include a link. They are different measures.
No. They are suggestions to investigate against the evidence. AI responses vary, and one scan cannot establish what will cause a future change.
ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. No credit card.